
Following last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee meeting, Lakeland-specific rerouting language now exists in both the House and Senate bills authorizing the CSX deal. But the Senate language is far less sweeping in its time frames and goals than the House language. Even so, Lakeland City Manager Doug Thomas told me via email, that the watered down Senate language is good enough, and the city is “…’positioned’ to support the initiative w/ approval of the subject amendments legislatively.” Obviously, that statement leaves a lot of ambiguity, probably because uncertainty continues to surround what’s going to happen. Issue number one is that a key senator, Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, says even the watered down Senate version will be DOA in his committe next week.
On the extended entry, I’ve provided a side-by-side comparison of the House and Senate language. Come take a look. And I’ll game out the likely scenarios as I see them.